>
WRJ160
>
Week 5
>
Plan for today:
*
Go over assignment 1
*
Have a wee discussion about editing and it's different sections
*
Talk about author relationships
>
Undertake an exercise in editing a story
*
Examine the going rates for these kind of services
>
Assignment 1
*
Reminder that the focus is on starting a publishing venture
>
Editing
>
Larger houses will have more layers of editing
*
Acquisitions/commissioning
>
EIC
*
(Editor in-chief)
>
Smaller: 3 main areas of concern
*
Developmental
*
Line
*
Proofreading
>
Also focus on decisions to be made ahead of time
*
If this comes around for you, then what're you going to do to ensure your head doesn't go fuzzy from all the work?
V
Best to think of it in stages overall:
>
1. Planning stages: willingness/ability to undertake edits
>
Every manuscript WILL require some level editing folks
*
There is no such thing as a perfect first draft
>
Go in expecting to do edits and to commit a significant amount of time
*
Schedules & life demands permitting
>
Because this WILL a commitment on your behalf
*
Yes it's the author's vision, but you're now invested (financially) in their realising that vision
*
Plus, you're going to be running through edits more than once, some of them very lengthy
>
Importance of reputation
V
You're taking on this piece of work, how you handle it will reflect on you
>
An author may talk about their experience and if they're only got bad things to say...
*
Then other authors of their acquaintance aren't gonna be hurrying to your door.
>
So, there's several scenarios:
>
The relatively clean Manuscript
*
The ideal scenario
>
A more experienced author, able to edit their own work to a higher degree
V
It's very difficult to edit your work as professionally as another pair of eyes
*
I'd say almost impossible
>
Or a newer author who's invested a huge amount of time in their manuscript
*
Maybe put it to some freelance editors before approaching you (we'll get to that later)
>
Some developmental work needed
*
This could be anything from restructuring a chapter to adding in a few paragraphs, clarifying the story
*
Or scrapping a smaller character/subplot altogether
*
But it's gonna take a month(ish) to get it sorted
>
Significant developmental work needed but timeliness/importance is key
>
So here's a not ideal (but very common) scenario:
*
The work is good, you see potential, the author is personable passionate but needs a fair hammering before you'd be happy to put your name to it
>
So you organise the big changes you need:
*
Change in narrative
>
Addition/cutting of characters
*
You're always likely to be cutting more than you're adding at this stage
*
Significant rewrites
>
You're looking at about… 3 months, maybe a little more
*
Remember, your author's have lives too, we all gotta eat, sleep, poop etc.
>
Considering their circumstances
*
Are they a single parent?
*
Any ongoing illnesses or treatment
*
Significant caring responsibilities
>
Not everyone will be able to work to the schedule you propose
>
In which case you can either:
>
Be flexible with your timings
*
Move onto another project while giving the author additional time they need
*
Or explain the truth of the situation and your incompatibility to the project at this point
>
Grounds for rejecting a piece
>
What are the reasons you might decline a submission? How would those reasons differ between works of prose and poetry?
>
Give me some examples then I'll give you mine :D
>
Very poor grammar & spelling
*
If a writer is choosing to write in a second/third language, credit to them
>
BUT for publication where, again, your reputation is on the line, the author needs to show significant mastery of this
*
Otherwise you're setting yourself up for a nightmare of a line edit
>
Structure
>
Chapter 1 (rushed ending)
>
E.g. their opening chapter(s) are a Lord of the Rings affair
V
I love Tolkien but damn the dude wasn't a structurally sound writer
*
This is the hill I'll die on
>
Or their ending been rushed, makes no sense, seems out of character with the rest of the book
*
Game of Thrones Season 8 *cough cough*
*
The author wanted to get it to you as soon as, or external circumstances meant they weren't at their best
>
If there's one chapter at this level, you can make significant edits
>
But if it's a continual problem it will appear as a reflection of poor writerly ability
*
And again, your rep's on the line
>
Cover letter
V
More of a side note
*
But you should have put the details/request for a cover letter in your submissions page
>
And if the author has needed to visit that page to submit and hasn't bothered to include one?
*
Red flag
>
Strategy & Timing:
>
Initial acceptance
>
Notify of need for some developmental edits
*
Again these can be varied depending on the level of the manuscript you're given
>
Check author’s willingness to accept & engage
>
Note: It's worth broaching the need for edits with an author prior to offering them a contract
*
Get a sense of their willingness to engage in edits
>
Or do they seem very opposed to the idea?
*
Will this be a headache down the line?
>
Briefest possible overview
>
This is partly to protect yourself
>
You don't want to give a lot of details about edits to the author without a contract signed
*
Since if you do nothing stops them from taking the book elsewhere after making the most of your hard work
>
Contract
>
Which should be clear on editing rights
>
We'll get into this more down the line but
*
You want to be clear about what you have the right to and to not edit
*
there has to be a line
>
After going to contract
>
Detailed plan for developmental editing
>
Now you pull the curtain back and reveal the grand plan of changes needed
>
You're not doing this to be mean but no point in sugarcoating
*
Firm but fair
>
Discuss it then
*
Ideally you'd meet in person for this kind of discussion with a copy of the manuscript and go through it together
*
These days you're more likely to do this online
>
Set out timelines
>
Developmental - longest (months?)
*
Anywhere between 1-3 months if not more
>
Line - needs to be quicker (weeks if possible)
*
Usually between 2-3
>
Proofreading - typically quick, like 2 weeks max
*
Usually a few days e.g. Mon-Fri
>
2. Developmental edits
>
Structural issues
>
Characters
>
How're they coming across?
*
Irritating
*
OOC - Out of character
*
Unsympathetic
*
Lack of clear motivation
*
etc.
>
Potentially problematic?
*
Characters potentially falling into harmful cliches?
>
Being used as tropes?
*
If any of you kill a woman or child off to further the character of a man so help me….
>
Internal logic
>
Say they've set up a magic system in a fantasy world or a writing from the view of a police officer
*
Does the magic system make sense? Or does it seem more 'making it up as they go'
>
Is the structure/interaction/hierarchy of the police force in keeping with real life?
>
Or if not does the change work?
*
After all, Jessica Fletcher should never be around so many murders
*
And Midsummer is the MOST DANGEROUS place to live in the UK
*
But there's enough suspension of disbelief there to engage in narrative enjoyment
>
Or, more hilariously, the date is 2002 and the protagonist is using an iPhone…
*
it wasn't invented till 2007 :D
>
Description (too much, not enough)
>
Purple Prose
*
…. Ug
>
Floating Dialogue
*
Where are we again?
>
Uncovering/clarifying theme
>
Story as story first
>
e.g., what's happening here? What's the goal? The structure?
*
You've likely gone over some narrative structures already, they'll never stop working
>
What it’s about (theme usually = 1 word) may become clearer in edits/rewrites
>
Some questions to really tell if an author understands their work:
*
Ask them to explain it to you in a sentence or less
*
Give you the main theme in one word
>
Explain the character's main drive in a sentence or two
*
Essentially, if they can't boil it down to the bare bones that way, then maybe they aren't so sure?
>
Things that may not be fixable (depending on severity)
>
Amateurish writing
*
A person can be trained to writer at a higher level
*
But that's not your role nor your responsibility
>
Do NOT take that one
*
For your own health
*
Plus, if editors did this then folks like me would be out of a job :P
>
Tropes/cliches
>
Some of my pet hatreds:
*
Woman in the refrigerator
*
Bury your gays
*
Deus ex Machina
*
We'll always see a little of these, in small doses they work
>
But when the main character or driving narrative is leaning into them too much?
*
That's when the writing gets derivative but not in a fun way
>
Cardboard characters
*
2D and then some
*
All characters important to a narrative need that level of complexity, of realism
>
Mostly because 2D characters are boring and quickly become predictable
*
We'll go with you so far
*
e.g., the very minor character acts exactly the same in book 1 but in book 2 is revealed to be more complex
>
Antihero vs unsympathetic
*
Sometimes the 'dark' 'against the rules' 'bad boy' trying to screw over 'the man' … is just a dick
*
Sometimes the girl lost alone in a new world needing the help of those around her… is a whiner
*
If a character's overall and continual presentation is rubbing you the wrong way, then there's likely an issue
>
Ethical issues
>
Intent of author
>
What are they trying to do
*
Is a central theme of their piece to highlight racism/hate crime or give attention to a group or people who've been ostracised in the past?
>
How can you support that?
*
Remember earlier? You're helping to bring their vision to completion
>
If you try and remove those aspects of author intent, are you still helping to do that?
*
And this isn't always done in one large decision
*
Several small edits pulling back the same thing will soon add up
>
Respect for the work
>
Style vs bad habits
*
Maybe you're not keen on a type of writing they use but the narrative & characters are solid
>
Don't try and overwrite their voice
*
Remember, it's NOT your work
>
It's one thing to cut grammar & spelling issues and another to fiddle with their tone
*
Example: Imagine reading a Terry Pratchett book without his wonderful tone
>
Prevailing taste
*
Again, maybe you prefer books with male/female/non-binary leads and this piece doesn't have that
>
It's not your place to make this the book you want to read
*
If you wanna read that book, go write it yourself
>
Respect for regionalism
*
Remember there are people in the world with experiences you're lacking
*
What seems confusing and nonsensical to you may be par for the course in the author's experience or the society they're writing about
>
Dialect
*
Similar to above
*
If the region the author is writing in contains a specific dialect and it makes sense to use it, then it should be there
*
Even if some of the word choices confuse you
>
Characters: sympathetic or not?
*
Again, a character may appear unsympathetic to you but to another group of people, like the target readership, they're highly sympathetic
>
Think back to structural issues
*
This is where you discuss intent with the author, realise their goals and help move towards them
>
Arrogance
>
OK to be confident in your own abilities
*
But you are not infallible
*
You don't know everything best
>
Approach the work with some humility
*
Everyone's new at this at some point
>
3. Line edits
>
A note on this:
>
Line Editing - going line by line and picking out everything
*
Structure, character, dialogue, description, spelling, grammar etc.
*
Copy Editing - focuses more on spelling, grammar, smaller issues
>
Several people will use these interchangeably, it doesn't matter too much though
*
You now know what they are
>
Disclaimers
*
This can be VERY draining work
>
Risks
*
Mental fatigue
*
Physical strain
>
Make sure you're 100% behind this book and its potential before moving forward and engaging in this process
*
Cause it won't be easy… you'll be seeing the manuscript in your sleep
>
Grammar
>
Typical error patterns
>
Sentence structure
>
Comma splices
*
Using a comma to link two independent clauses
>
Run-ons
*
Putting two separate ideas or clauses together without the required punctuation
>
Dangling modifiers
*
Usually seen when a sentence is missing its subject
*
Leads to a grammatical modifier becoming ambiguous and it could be misinterpreted
>
Punctuation
>
Dialogue 
*
Relationship to paragraphing
*
When to embed it in exposition
*
Whether or not to use quotation marks
>
Semicolons
>
Generally underused
*
Particularly in the UK since our English education doesn't give much time over to grammatical rules
*
Or overused as overcompensation
>
Colons
*
Underused, useful
*
Amplification/clarification
>
Exclamation points
>
People like chucking them into the end of some dialogue which is at odds with yelling
*
e.g., "Shut up!" they whispered
>
Commas
*
Can lead to some VERY long sentences or runs the risk of falling into splices
*
There’s more, and the readings list them
>
Track changes, marginal notes, suggestion feature
>
Very useful
*
Word will track any changes made to a document and you can see them
*
So if you change small things like SPG issues in a text the author can see
>
Sometimes to bare in mind with changes
>
If you think an additional paragraph is needed don't write it in your attempt at the authors voice
*
That's just icky and disrespectful
*
Instead, write is as you would, highlight it and suggest in a comment the author rewrite it in their voice and ensure they get the meaning you're after across
>
4. Proofreading
>
Think of this as the final step prior to publication
*
Just looking to make sure nothing's been missed
*
The manuscript should already be polished
>
Review in what the reading calls the PDF stage (immediately before going to print)
*
Literally the last look over before it goes
>
Should be relatively quick because the heavy lifting has been done at the developmental and line edit stages
*
This is why it can be done in a matter of days
*
No more than 2 weeks
*
Both you and the author will be ridiculously familiar with the work by now
>
Not the time to go back and make any changes other than typo corrections
*
Everything else should have been completed
>
Author relationships
>
Ideal scenario: authors want to publish with you again and vice versa
*
You both had a good time, produced a successful release and you're looking to work on sequels/another stand alone
>
Some scenarios where things could go wrong
>
Insistence on continued edits
*
Maybe you butt heads over an edit you want made that the author is reluctant to
>
Insecurity, confidence issues
*
The author (particularly if it's their first publication) may be nervous and want their hand held
*
You do NOT have the time or energy to do that
>
General rude tendencies
*
In communication
*
Slow to complete required edits
*
Consistently arguing or resisting any changes
>
Dishonesty
*
Saying work will be done & not delivering
*
Speaking with other publishers/editors behind your back, etc.
>
General people skills
*
Give & take, being reasonable
*
This is a stressful process for you both at times
*
It's important to remember you're both only human and speak to each other as such
>
Professional authors with high but justified expectations vs prima donnas
*
Just like you can't take the time to hold an author's hand
>
You shouldn't put up with unreasonable demands because they're high profile
*
If an author's get into that headspace… quite frankly they need a reality check
>
Contracts should have clear language on releasing authors
>
So they know, and you know, if they're tied in for a full series or just a one-off
*
Avoids any messiness down the line from either of you
*
Or just be clever when prepping these things :P
>
Of note: Absolute Write & Predators and Editors are both offline at the moment
>
These are websites that were dedicated to giving info about editors and agencies
*
Predators and editors generally told you who to steer clear of in those circles
*
Absolute Write was a community website for writers where they could share experiences and offer advice to people getting started
*
Even if they're not currently active worth knowing about them and the seeing how word is spread about good, or bad, editors
*
Break! :D
>
Task for you all:
*
On the Learning Space there's a link to three short stories
>
I want you to choose one of the three and have a go at approaching it in a editor's style
*
So, choose which you'd like (there's a horror piece, a romance piece and a literary piece)
*
And then try and set yourself a hierarchy
>
Think about the lecture content and Developmental Edits
*
Start big and go small
*
Look at the overall structure, the characters, the themes, dialogue, the description
*
Then narrow in a bit, maybe start going line by line, really dig into your story and see what needs improving
*
Then we'll come back and have a chat about it! :D
>
Week 8
>
Production (Part 1)
>
First assignment
*
Due Friday 18th March at 4pm
*
Try not to wait until 3:50 to submit it please.
>
If you're having trouble submitting:
*
Email me and send over a copy of your case study with the email
>
And always keep the TurnItIn receipt
*
So if anything goes wrong on our end you've got proof the computer registered you submitting a file
>
Necessary Knowledge
*
This week we're looking at the creation of a book.
>
Even if you're not going into publishing, this is stuff that's beneficial for you to know:
*
You may have to offer feedback on book and cover design as a writer/editor
*
You may have to proofread blurbs
>
It's an advantage to know about book layout
*
If you're more informed you're better able to help the book move forward as a publisher, author or editor
*
And that makes you better to work with & more likely to receive continued work.
>
So whether you're working as a writer, publisher, editor, book designer, ebook seller, book shop owner, etc.,
*
This is stuff you'll benefit from knowing or will be expected to know.
*
Remember we talked about publisher's not holding their author's hands? Wellllll the same's true here.
>
Do we all have a book?
*
If not, the library is down the hall, nab one and come back :D
>
Book Production
*
This is the point where it's time to print the book
>
We have:
>
The manuscript
*
It's been edited, proofread, and formatted
*
The author, editor & publisher are all happy with it
>
We need:
*
A cover
*
An ISBN (we'll get into this one later)
*
Maybe a BISAC (and we'll get into this one later too)
>
A question:
*
In the overall process of book production - we can include ebooks in this as well -
*
Which bits to publishing companies do in-house, and which ones are most likely to be farmed out to other firms or freelancers?
>
Some points I could think of
>
Book cover design
*
I'm no artist, I get someone to make that for me
*
BUT you wanna make sure you hire an artist experienced in designing book covers
>
Why do you think that is?
>
Something I didn't know until recently:
*
They need to look good in a thumbnail
*
And now I show you Marshall's book cover…
>
Material sourcing
*
I'm not gonna chop down a tree and turn it into paper
>
The Printing
*
I don't know how to print & bind a book
>
File creation
*
This is more ebook specific and isn't as large an issue these days
*
But if I need a word doc turned into an epub, I'd rather trust someone to run that process for me so I know all my formatting will stay pretty
>
And a thought:
>
Consider what you're going to publish and think, what tends to be published in that manner?
*
Print - comes with some prestige
>
Ebook - much less overhead
*
You're not paying for a physical object
>
Audiobooks
*
Becoming much more popular, good for travelling & commutes
*
Still needs cover art, sourcing a recording studio & a decent narrator
>
Book Layout
*
We're gonna pull a fair bit from by Meena Azzollini here
>
A book layout is pretty much like a floor plan of a house (Azzollini)
*
If you use good design principles, i.e. you build the bedroom furthest from the busy road and ensure there's good lighting into the living room, etc., then you get a good house
*
So, if you use good design principles for a book's layout, then you end up, more often than not, with a good book
>
There are some aspects of book design that'll be the same across the board, but there are others that'll change depending on who the book it targeted towards:
>
Who is your target audience?
>
Kid's Book:
*
e.g., You're publishing a kid's book. It's colourful, bright with many illustrations and pretty sparse text
*
This means the layout of your pages may not be the same across all your pages as each page will be different from the other.
>
Adult Suspense Book
*
Wholly text based, more uniform. Less of a hassle from a design perspective
*
BUT you best think carefully about the text you use and the white space you have
*
Is it an eBook, hardback or a paperback?
*
Does it have images and illustrations or is it text-based only?
>
As an unofficial rule, there are 6 key aspects of book layout you need to keep in mind:
>
1. Margins
*
The blank space around the text on every page of the book
*
If you know how to use your margins properly then you will create a visually appealing page.
>
Something to notice about margins:
*
Margins
>
The inner margin (otherwise known as 'the gutter') is wider than the outer margin… why?
*
Because pages are bound together or stitched up.
*
This way when you open the book, the text looks like it is in the centre of the page.
*
So to do this, a portion of the inner margin is covered by the spine.
*
A quick dissertation horror story!
>
Top and bottom margins can change too
>
These are some reasons why:
*
Running-heads-and-feet-in-book-layout
>
Running Head
>
This is a 'header' that'll go on the top margin of a page
>
Reasons for this can be
*
Book title
*
Chapter titles
>
Author Name
*
This one's very useful if you've publishing an anthology
>
You'll want a decent amount of white space between a running head and the body text
>
Anyone thing why?
*
Pretty simple - so that the eye doesn't catch it as part of the body text and end up messing with a reader's flow.
>
Ideally, the bottom margin is quite large, and it provides a balance of white space after a block of text on a page.
*
Margins allow an ample amount of white space which is pleasing to the eye and allows the reader’s eye to move through the text without any strain.
>
Beyond the margins you have what's called a 'Bleed Area'
*
The bleed area is that part of the page which goes beyond the trim line – so that when the page is printed, this area will be trimmed off.
>
If your book has an image, photograph or other elements that go all the way to the edge of the page, then a bleed area needs to be added.
*
Bleed-and-Trim-size-in-book-layout
>
So why do we do this?
*
Because it ensures that when a page is printed and trimmed there are no unprinted edges or white space.
*
And therefore it looks nice :D
>
Here's a look at this in practice:
*
Full_pic
*
And now I show you Marshall's book proofs…
>
2. Whitespace
*
It's important to keep printing costs under control, especially if you're a small/new publisher
>
Since printing costs are mostly based on the number of pages, some authors try to reduce the number of pages to be printed by reducing margins and line spacing.
>
Can anyone think of a reason why this could cause a problem?
*
It creates a tight layout and makes your book look congested, leading to a very unpleasant reading experience.
>
This this:
*
Screenshot_2022-03-16_at_12.34.28
>
Vs. this:
*
Screenshot_2022-03-16_at_12.35.16
*
Which one's more pleasant to read?
>
A perfectly balanced page layout will include a fair amount of white space which balances the text and images present in the book.
*
Adequate margins are your first starting point for creating that much-needed white space.
*
This is why they're important
*
Line spacing is also important, creates a more pleasant experience and lessens the chance a reader will get lost in the text.
>
Sinks and Drop Caps
*
These are elements of page layout that make use of white:
*
whitespace-and-rop-cap-in-book-layout
>
As you can see, the sink is when you start your text almost in the middle of the page with a lot of white space above it.
>
It's a clever way to add a lil'illustration and a way to signal to the reader that there's a chance in the narrative, e.g., a new chapter, time skip, etc.
>
We tend to see this more in fiction or what we call 'narrative non-fiction'
*
Things like self-help books, travel writing, where an authorial voice is important
>
Drop Caps are when you use a large capital letter at the beginning of a text block or paragraph and it has the depth of two or more lines of normal text.
*
They're also good for adding a bit of style and grabbing a reader's attention, drawing them into a new paragraph.
*
Usually they appear together with a sink, but not always
>
Do you think of any specific kinds of books when you see a drop cap?
*
For me it's children's books and fantasy mostly.
*
But if you're publishing a piece within spheres that make use of drop caps often? Then that's something you should consider in your layout
>
3. Line Width
>
What's the ideal number of characters per line?
*
To help answer this, have a look at your books and count the characters
*
Remember a 'character' is any one space on a line, so you'll count the letters of every word, but also the spaces.
>
Take a minute to do that and we'll report back.
*
According to what Marshall told me, the sweet spot is 65
*
Again useful for you to know when it comes to designing you book
*
if you need more line space you need more margin space, then more bleed space and an overall larger book
>
If you make the font bigger, that'll bump your size up the same way
*
So, while 65 is an average magic number, lots of other factors can impact it
>
4. Typography
*
We had a class on this so I won't go into it too much :D
*
Remember how we talked about the importance of fonts, 'fitting in' with what the other published pieces similar to yours were doing?
*
Serif Vs. Sans-Serif
>
And, interestingly enough, non-fiction books are where we tend to see more in typography
*
breakout-box-in-book-layout
>
5. Images
*
Welcome to a pain in your butt…
>
Firstly, does anyone know what the ideal DPI (dots per inch) is for an image that'll go into a book?
*
300DPI
*
However, most images aren't gonna be that magic number
*
So the layout person (who in my fictional publishing house is a freelancer/outsourced company) have to tweak it and you'll likely end up losing resolution
*
So, what looks good on your computer screen, may not look good on the page
>
If you're making an ebook
*
Then you send the file with the image in it out to them and they'll fit it in the correct DPI for you.
>
Permission
*
Be sure you have permission to use any image in your published book, because if you don't you'll end up getting sued pretty quick
*
Now, if they're images the author's taken/drawn themselves that's fine, no need to worry
>
Otherwise you'll need confirmation.
*
Now you don't wanna get tangled in trying to find copyright/license owners and then possibly pay them for the image use. That's on the author
>
The author has to provide you with written confirmation or prove there's a loophole that allows their use
*
E.g., to educate
*
But do not take on that job yourself, you don't have the time or mental energy for it
>
6. Widow and Orphans
>
Firstly...
*
Ahem - don't judge me it's all I can think of when I hear 'widows and orphans'
*
Now, these are single lines that, during formatting, get separated from the rest of their paragraph.
*
If a single line of text moves on to the next page or next column of text at the top, it is called a widow.
*
A single line of text or a few words is an orphan when it's isolated at the bottom of the page or a paragraph.
>
Here's an example
*
orphans-and-widows-in-book-layout
>
So, why don't we like these? Any ideas?
*
One, it makes your page layout look shabby.
*
Two, it impedes the reader’s reading experience as it causes them to pause mid-paragraph.
>
A paragraph is a block of information
*
We see it as a block because it has a line separating it from other text, or it has an indent in the first line
*
The space between gives your brain time to digest the information properly
*
If a paragraph gets forced onto the next page that disrupts that digestion process and makes the piece harder to read
*
And if you make your work hard for us as markers to read, for instance, then we'll call you out on it. You want life to be as easy as possible for a reader
>
How do we avoid them?
*
You may have to rework your text layout which can be tricky.
>
This can be done by reworking your text or adjusting tracking and kerning options in your layout software.
*
For me, this'll again be handled by a wonderful freelancer experienced in page layout
>
But for the sake of info:
*
Tracking adjusts the space between a group of letters, words or whole paragraphs.
*
Kerning will adjust space between two characters.
*
Both tracking and kerning are font-dependent. So the adjustments you make for one kind of font is not the same for another.
*
Aaaaaand break!
>
Task 1 for the session:
*
Part 4 on the Learning Space
>
Task 2 for the session:
>
Part 5 on the Learning Space
*
https://www.nielsenisbnstore.com/ - UK Store for ISBN's
*
Stands for - International Standard Book Number
>
Annoying fact
*
In the UK, Australia & USA you have to purchase an ISBN
*
Most other parts of the world? The government issues them without charge.
>
How many ISBNs?
*
Have any of you noticed multiple ISBN's in your books?
*
Ones for hardback, paperback, etc.,
>
Back in the day with ebooks bigger publishers tried to force all forms of ebook to have a different ISBN
*
So if you have Mobi, epub, PDF, etc, you'd need a separate ISBN for each one
*
These days that isn't the case
*
In fact, you can buy an ISBN for one version of an ebook and the rest will be attributed back to that original ISBN
*
So, why not give it to the word doc manuscript? :D
>
(If time) BISAC Codes
>
These make me laugh:
*
BISAC - Book Industry Standards and Communications
*
Essentially a 'tagging' system to give your book a category to come under, you might even see these on some of the books you're looking at
>
Week 9
*
Production (2)
>
Why are book sales so complicated?
>
Well, much like Bruno, it's not a subject a lot of author's or publishers really talk about.
>
There's an element of 'secrecy' & 'mythology' to the process which is a way to dress up saying...
>
Gatekeeping
*
Just in case you're unsure, gatekeeping is when people within a certain sphere, do their best to keep out others who have an interesting the same topic but for whatever (usually baseless) reason are seen as not being good enough to join
*
This, to this day, is still how some larger publishing houses look at smaller publishing houses or ebook & POD houses.
>
Plus the media don't really help...
*
e.g., in 2016 newspapers lorded the 'return of print' (as if it ever really left) since print book sales had gone up the last two years in a row…
>
Can anyone guess what two kinds of books may have been responsible for this wee push from 2014-2016?
>
Adult Colouring Books
*
Colouring_Book
>
YouTube Celebrity Memoirs
*
pewdiepie_book
>
So, what does this tell us about media reports on the sales of books as a whole?
>
Any ideas?
*
That they're pretty damn unhelpful to fiction writers or anyone looking to publish fiction novels.
>
This leads to a lot of confusion in writers who, often, have no idea how well their book is selling, if it's selling at all.
*
So, even if you're not planning to venture into the world of publishing, it's a damn advantage to have some understanding about this sales process.
>
So, what's a book sale?
*
Well turns out it's not just you forking over £30 for that super fancy leather bound edition of the complete words of H.P. Lovecraft…
>
In fact, here are four different kinds right off the bat:
>
The number of copies that are printed
*
The amount the publishing house has commissioned from the offsite printers
*
Or the amount requests in a POD sale
*
The number of copies that've been shipped to stores or other markets (like libraries)
>
The number of copies that've been sold to readers
*
Folks like you & me buying a book from Amazon, WHSmiths or Waterstones
>
The Neilson BookScan number
*
This is a company who collect data about book sales
*
Some author's even use if like a rating system
>
It 'supposedly' details how many books have been sold but even then… it's murky
>
So… why is it often used as a resource?
*
Because the author & the publisher (who have access to much more accurate numbers) often won't share them
*
So this is one way rival author's/publishers can get an idea of how their competitors are doing
>
But why the inaccuracy!?
*
Whelp, BookScan works through ISBN - International Standard Book Number, remember them?
>
A clerk scans the barcode & a sale is recorded, yay!
*
But...
>
BookScan doesn't record ebook sales
>
Soooooooo why can this be a problem?
*
Because ebook sales can be A LOT and folks Amazon & other major ebook vendors don't share their sales
>
So only the publisher (not even the author until they get their royalties) has any idea how well it's selling
*
Usually, ebooks can account for less than 1/3 of overall sales
>
Can anyone think of some kinds of genres where ebook sales may be higher?
*
Sci-Fi & Romance are the biggest, sometimes ebooks sales account for 50% or more!
*
It gets data from most big book stores but not all of them and it's easy for it to miss smaller 'Mom & Pop' bookstores too.
>
Doesn't track libraries too and that can be significant…
>
Any idea how many libraries there are in the UK?
*
3,667 - that could be 1,000 of your 3,000 book sales right there which BookScan never clocks
>
And then there's avenue's smaller book presses tend to make use of:
*
Selling at conferences & Expos
*
Private readings at local cafe's etc.
*
Book festivals
*
Purchases direct from the publisher itself
>
So, what is a major problem we see here? Anyone spot a big'ol red flag (other than the ones we've already seen) in BookScan?
>
It's still leaning almost exclusively on that traditional route of publication
*
Sign up with a Big 5, who give you an advance, then print thousands and sell them through bookstores all over the UK
>
A first-time author who signs on with a small publisher may do pretty well with ebook sales, print on demand sales, they maybe hit up some conferences, book festivals & other events and sell some to their local bookstores.
*
BookScan won't count any of that.
>
So to 'rivals' or snooping authors, it looks like the author's work hasn't sold well & that reflects on the publishing house seeming less reputable
*
So if you ask me times need to change… but isn't that the case with almost everything in this world at the mo?
*
Except David Attenborough - he is NOT allowed to change.
>
And all these can have widely different results (only adding to that aforementioned confusion)
>
Here's an example:
*
1). The publishing house commissions 5,000 books to be printed offsite.
*
2). They only sell 3,000 to bookstores/other markets
*
3). Of those 3,000 only 2,000 are sold to customers
*
4). Meanwhile, BookScan is telling you only 600 copies of your book have been sold
*
5). And we haven't even got into ebooks or audiobooks yet…
>
So, what IS the actual amount?
>
Usually, a combo of 2). & 3). plus your ebook & audiobook sales if you have them.
*
Remember there's still a lot of mental gatekeeping in author's minds
>
To many a physical book holds prestige, whereas an electronic one does not.
*
Despite the money all being the same when it's in your bank account…
*
2). They only sell 3,000 to bookstores/other markets
>
3). Of those 3,000 only 2,000 are sold to customers
V
So lets break these ones down:
*
A retailer usually (but not always) has the right to return any unsold books to the publisher
>
So even if a copy may be seen as 'sold' for a period of time, it will then be returned if it doesn't sell to a customer
*
On author royalty statements, a certain amount of money is always withheld as "Reserve Against Returns"
*
So as an author you'll not be expected to pay your royalties back if you book doesn't sell but the royalties you receive will be less because of it.
>
Right, what's this info not getting at? A lot of this was from your first reading, so what's it hinting at but not saying?
>
Well, publishing needs a kick into the recent decade.
>
There's so many older systems that won't talk to each other
*
Publisher's won't talk about sales & process
*
Author's won't talk about royalties or advances
>
The larger publishers really look down on smaller, indie or ebook publishers
>
Plus these larger ones go out of their way to keep costs down and hoard the money like Smaug
*
They can do this by paying advances to all who sign with them and larger hits cover less successful ones
*
Smaller presses can't do that, and again cause there's no transparency or communication, that makes less experienced authors think they're sketchy.
>
And publishing HATES embracing new technology
*
BookScan for instance outright ignoring ebook or audiobook sales
>
Now, let's move onto a different kind of 'Yikes'
>
First of all, who's done the second reading on the Learning Space?
*
You're not in trouble if you haven't
*
But this task really needs you to know a little about it
>
Sooooo if some of you need to, take 10mins and have a skim
*
And while you do, make some notes about anything you see in this article that sets off red flags or otherwise grabs your attention.
>
Now, let's have a chat about this article
>
A quick bit o'backstory
*
Marshall & I found this by just doing some research on google about publishing, looking for new developments, etc.
>
And this article came pretty high up on the search results
*
This means google recognises it as an 'authority' on the subject… EEP.
>
Some bits that I found:
>
Being pitched as 'make a PDF ebook'
*
Does anyone know how to save a word.doc as a PDF?
*
It's real easy to do
>
Title Vs. Target audience:
>
Title - 'Make an ebook: How to easily create a PDF ebook that rocks'
*
We'd assume this is for author's lacking confidence with the thought of creating an ebook
>
Target Audience - Marketers & Bloggers
*
All about getting more traffic to you blog which what could almost be seen as a 'clickbait' strategy
>
Being Pitched to marketers & online bloggers
>
Look at the lexicon (the words) they're pulling from:
*
'loyal subscribers'
*
'top bloggers'
>
Little financial backing
*
Not a model you want to rely on
>
i.e. 'giving away a book for free'
*
In some cases, a different version of this can work
>
Some authors make the first chapter of their book available for free on their website & then readers can pay for the rest
*
A 'try before you buy' mentality
>
But if you're a first time author and the advice you see about handling your first finished manuscript is to put it online for free…
*
That's not good.
>
Assumes a writer may know about Google Analytics & SEO optimisation
>
Does anyone here know how to employ/use Google Analytics?
*
Cause I sure as heck don't
>
But, in summary it's a plug-in that lets you see how many people visit your website & for how long
>
So say you've running a wordpress blog you can use google analytics to see...
*
The demographics of your audience
*
How many people visit specific webpages (or articles)
*
How long each visit lasts
>
So, from a 'content production' standpoint it can be very useful to see what pieces have been well received and what pieces haven't
>
In a similar vein, I have a question for you...
*
When you're suddenly hit with inspo, and you have a heck of a good writing day, how would you feel about being told you were producing content?
*
Since that's how this article is framing your writing.
>
Anyone know what SEO stands for?
>
Search Engine Optimisation
*
Essentially you figure out the keywords people are searching for and that search engines, like google are clocking when displaying results
>
You then feed into that by ensuring your 'content' has the right words so you get pushed higher up the google search results list
*
Which, from a 'being found' point, can be valuable… After all, how often do you hit up the second page of google?
*
Overall, this is a great example of some of the… crap, out there that'll send you in the wrong direction.
>
Offset Printing Vs. POD
*
We've talked about this a little bit already but worth revisting:
>
Offset Printing
*
When the publisher outsources the printing to a factory
>
Some Pros & Cons:
*
There can be BIG discounts if you order a large supply
*
But then there's the worry about unsold books ending up in a warehouse
*
This is seen as the 'correct' (bleh) route and carried with it prestige and tradition
*
If you're going to be printing a lot of books, then this is deffo the route you want to take
>
POD - Print on Demand
*
When the publisher only gets a copy printed if the order is made
>
Coming back to Gatekeeping
>
POD has a slight whiff of being 'unreputable' but all major publishers use it
>
Sometimes a person wants a new copy of an out-of-print book
*
They contact the publisher who'll, usually, print one for them and send it out
*
Tends to be a pricier process, but you know your book has sold
*
Less waste
*
Better for the environment
*
No returns costs
*
But is a lengthier process (i.e. if a customer orders a POD book, they're not going to have it the next day)
>
Activities:
>
Activity 4 on the Learning Space
*
Quick note: Make sure you're focusing on UK book printers :D
*
Interact with the choices you'll need to make
*
See what happens if you request different amounts
>
Knowing the names of different parts of the book may help:
*
Book-Anatomy-Hardcover-Book-Bookbinding-Diagram
>
Activity 5 on the Learning Space
>
Web-based/Software Options
*
i.e. a place you upload your word.doc/PDF to and it's converted into an epub
*
Or software you download onto your PC/Laptop that you run to convert the file
*
Freelancers/Publishing houses
*
Someone I wanna talk about quickly
>
One of the first 'author service' publishing companies to offer POD publishing
*
And ended up contributing to it having a bad name
*
Works published by them have been of poor quality - as a publisher that's what you want to avoid
*
Plus they've very cagey about having prices on their website - always a red flag
*
And now we migrate next door!
>
Week 10
*
Marketing :D
>
So, what's changed from before?
*
Or more specifically:
>
A great deal of assumption and expectation surrounds the publishing industry.
*
There are strong norms, and they’re based largely on tradition and prestige.
>
But where publicity is concerned (specifically, the amount that book publishers do on authors’ behalf), do you think much has changed? Really?
>
On the whole (not in every example) author's are expected to be doing more
>
In the past, publishers would try to 'cultivate' their authors
*
E.g., they saw an author as a quality writer
>
So they'd help organise publicity for their works
*
Books Tours
*
Local Events
>
Interviews
*
Magazines
*
Radio (local if they're smaller)
>
Some houses (usually bigger ones but not exclusively the Big 5) would have publicists
*
The experts with connections & know-how
>
Remember in Wk.3 when we talked about the different formats & aesthetics?
*
Screenshot_2022-03-30_at_15.20.00
*
Like all these glorious romance covers… They tend to be a wee bit similar
>
A publicist knows all about those different aesthetics and they know you need to take a different approach to try and market them successfully
>
A question:
*
Say you had to market two books you have in your publishing house (imagine you're a pretty wealthy one too, looks of money flying about)
>
Book 1 is this:
*
embargo_ebook_web
>
Book 2 is this:
*
Romance
>
Would you have to market them differently?
>
In what ways? Gimme some examples :D
>
The crux of the point here is this:
*
There's not straight up 'do this + do that = success' formula, and we'll be getting back to that over the course of the class.
>
Now though… things are a little bit different:
>
More Profit
>
Publishing houses have become more focused on the profit in the short term
*
The business side of things is rearing it's ugly head…
>
They want to know they'll make their money back and there are a few things that help convince them of that
*
Blogs
*
Social Media
*
Self-Marketing
>
Now… what's an issue that comes to mind with all of these?
*
It's all work that's going to be falling on the author
*
In the past the house/publicist would take over these roles (some still do)
*
But as a whole, the author is now expected to do a whole lot more.
>
What is a book tour?
>
As a publisher, would you consider sending an author on one?
>
Pros:
>
Wonderful way to get your book out there to new people who may not have heard of it (or you) before
*
e.g., fans/interested people bringing friends to small readings/Q+A's
>
Sweet engagement with fans
>
Personal story:
>
I met Phillip Pullman when I was 11 and he was very sweet, signed my copy of the subtle knife and told me to try writing my own adventures if I wanted to
*
I much later found out he's a raging dick but 11yr old Eoin was inspired…
*
And now I have novel draft I gotta do something with
>
Great way to drum up interest even before it's happened
*
Interviews - 'Oh you're going on tour?' 'Yes we're hitting up…'
>
Cons:
>
It's exhausting
*
You know when you gotta be happy & enthusiastic & (ugh) nice all the time around people?
>
Anyone ever worked in retail?
>
I did for 11yrs, and that's the kinda energy you gotta have - super happy, nice, helpful, enthusiastic
*
Even if you're just in a room with like… 10 people.
*
And it's exhausting
*
Then you gotta pack up, travel for hours, dump your stuff in a hotel room and go do it all again
>
They're also not as glamorous as people make them out to be.
>
Marshall went on a book tour for one of his earlier pieces...
>
In Chicago this happened…
*
No one turned up to the event
>
He went back to his hotel and realised he'd left his bag there
*
And someone stole his bag
*
So yea, not gonna be 5* treatment
>
You're away
*
You're not in your home - sounds obvious but who doesn't love their own bed?
*
I hate being away, I never sleep so good. And then you're busy too...
*
It's not fun
>
Security
>
Imagine your author is pretty high profile/written a book that's caused contention...
>
Tour meetings are an open space people will target:
>
E.g., Irshad Manji
*
Manji was in Indonesia to promote the release of her most recent book,  'Allah, Liberty and Love', which outlines a plan for Muslim reformation modelled on the U.S. civil rights movement.
>
Here's a quote from an article about her tour:
*
…After five tumultuous days of security threats and cancelled events, a book discussion with Ms. Manji was violently attacked by religious extremists believed to be with the Indonesian Mujahidin Council. “As the gangsters shouted, ‘Where is Manji?’ citizens shielded my body with theirs,” said Ms. Manji in a statement she posted to Twitter on Thursday.
A colleague of Ms. Manji, Emily Rees, was rushed to hospital after her arm was struck by a metal bar. Two other attendees suffered head injuries.
*
So it's not a common thing but it's something to consider
>
Harry Potter
*
During a book tour for Deathly Hallows armed men with guns broke into the tour bus in an attempt to steal some copies of the book before its official release date
>
No one was hurt but the publisher was immediately called since it 'affect the tour'
*
… Imagine getting that phone call…
>
How would you budget for that?
>
Lots of bills to pay:
*
Hotels/Air BnB's
*
Transport costs
*
Food costs
*
Space rental
*
Books for the tour
*
Security (if deemed necessary)
*
Visa costs (if needed)
*
Additional merchandise
*
Guest speakers
*
And likely more…
>
What steps would it entail?
*
How do you go about this?
>
Plan EVERYTHING
>
Locations
>
Think where you want the author to go - places where they'll be well received
*
Their hometown - book cafe's/community centres there
*
Is their book about a Scottish detective? Maybe they should tour in some Scottish cities then?
*
Does their book have an LBGTQAI lead/heavy narrative? Maybe have them visit some charities helping those people or a shop that stocks merch for them
*
Don't just chose spots randomly, you may only have the money/time to visit a select few, make the most of them
*
Budget (we've chatted about)
>
Bookings
*
Contact venues and see if there's availabilty
*
Check cost
*
Maybe a book shop may turn you away cause they're not going to be open/understaffed, could be a million reasons so always check early
>
Drumming up interest before
*
Social media/blogs/interviews - let people know this is happening
*
Drum up interest during
*
And after too, 'fresh back from a very successful tour' - it does make things sound more impressive
>
Often, publishers and literary agents will make acquisition decisions based (partly) on an author’s following on social media.
>
What issues can you think they'll cause?
>
Number of followers isn’t an indicator of book selling
*
^Just like how the Nielson BookScan number isn't an accurate representation of how many books you've sold.
>
Just because you follow someone on Twitter doesn't mean you'll pay money for their content
*
I follow Michael McIntyre on twitter… I've never bought one of his DVD's or books so…
>
You can buy followers - bots, etc.
*
It's not a good metric
>
But, it's important you understand the desire to have some metric for potential sales cause publishing's a conservative business.
>
Quality still needs to win out
>
If you, as a publisher, are presented with a truly fantastic piece of work you really believe in from an unknown, unpublished author, are you just going to let it go in favour of a 23yr old celeb's biography who's got hundreds of thousands of social media followers?
*
Firstly - take both if you feel you can
*
Secondly - don't you dare leave the first one in the lurch
>
What does the term “author platform” mean?
>
Well, the term comes into circulation during the 90’s
*
And at first it was more focused on non-fiction – about celebs, politicians, subject matter experts, people who had an audience ready to go
>
Their 'platform' was having insight into knowledge/experience that other people did not
*
e.g., What's it like being the vice president of a country?
>
What's actually living at the bottom of the Mariana Trench
*
Hint - Eels… lots and lots of EELS
*
How did you handle coming to fame at an early age and then going onto a successful acting career?
>
Over time though, it began to become synonymous with 'Author = style' - let's try this
*
Author - Style
>
Jaquline Wilson
*
Children's Books
>
Steven King
*
Horror Books
>
Sir Terry Pratchett
*
Fantasy/Discworld
>
Jane Austen
*
Romance
>
So, this author - style mentality evolves to your social media following
>
What to you already have in place?
*
Think about what you've written in the past
*
Is that writing an accurate reflection of you as a writer?
>
Have you exclusively worked in only one form/genre?
*
I doubt it… we lecturers tend to try and force you outta that, at least for your assignments
>
What genre are you identified with as a writer?
>
Do you have to work in a specific genre?
*
God no
>
Is it fair to expect a writer to only work in one genre?
*
Noooooooooope
>
And this method of identification (more pigeon-holing really) can be problematic
>
For example - TJ Klune
*
This is personal, but he's one of my fave authors - book got me through an unhappy time
*
This book - 'Tell Me It's Real' is a comedy, part of a series
>
Klune then goes on to write another book - 'Into This River I Drown'
*
Now it's highly rated in the gay community
>
But when it first came out, several reviews bombed it because… it wasn't funny
*
It's about a man coming to terms with the death of his father
*
^Not designed to be funny
>
Almost makes a good case for pseudonyms - But then you're back at the beginning - no social media or other backing for this new identity just so you can change the genre you write in
*
So it's tricky.
>
So, this serves the publishers interests
*
Being busy on social media means good sells
>
But - less social media active authors get side-lined
*
And maintaining a 24/7 social media presence is exhausting
*
I had to live tweet at a conference once, I was knackered…
>
Marketing Vs. Writing
>
Creativity as a complex problem-solving process (go with me on this)
>
Creativity – When you’re inspired its in the service of a problem
>
Home renovation shows - they want to redo the room in a way that’s more functional
*
So they have to be creative with the space
*
Make the most of the height, put a desk by the window… put in a hammock etc.,
>
Creative Problems in the Arts
>
You have an idea or several ideas & think it’s a cool novel –
>
a complex decision-making process of…
*
Who’re the characters?
*
Plot
*
Setting
*
Language
*
Style
*
Grammar
*
All different tiny decisions you’re consistently making
>
For me, I realised 'I'd like to read a book that does this' - and there was no book that did it, so I wrote it
*
Problem - Solution
>
Any creative work is a problem-solving process so you’re making connections between existing bits of knowledge and putting them together
*
Writers block is when you can’t do that - you're missing the little nugget needed to make the connection & get over the block
>
The problem with marketing:
>
Because author platform discussion = writers are already engaged in this complex creative process with lots of steps
>
How much of your creative time you should spend on writing vs. marketing?
*
Younger writers – when you’re 20/25/30 you’re still stumbling into this, finding your voice and seeing how it works
>
When you’re in your 30’s you kinda hit your stride
*
Doesn't mean you're a bad writer before then, not at all
>
Just lacking some life experience - we can only get that with age
*
I'm hoping I'll reach 30 and magically know everything…
*
So, thinking a lot about marketing more than the writing will really heavily impact your creative process
>
How do I make sure this will sell? What works best for the money & marketing
*
E.g., in my case I've got a book with a gay lead - I know that'll impact my publishing options
*
You may start to think 'Well I need to do this/that/and this' because it's what the other books are doing and those sell...
*
Where does that leave the fun for you? The creativity you wanna employ?
>
The boundaries of author platforms really distort how creative you can be.
*
Publisherisher ultimately have to make decisions about a long-term sustainable process – writers make their work over many years, making a ‘quick buck’ off it quickly isn’t how it should be done.
>
Younger writers need to know about this since they’ll have to enforce those boundaries to make work sustainable  
*
Regardless of whether or not you jump into publishing - make sure you're aware of this
*
Set boundaries for your work, protect that creativity you have
>
The Author's Guild & Notable Authors
*
^Make sure you keep coming back to this website, it's a fantastic resource that'll be so useful to you all your life if you're any kind of writer :D
*
So, now we're gonna do a little research… and by 'we' I mean 'you'
*
Here's a list of several authors who went about publishing a little differently than most. I want you to do a bit of research on these authors, find out how they published their work & then we'll have a chat about it
>
E. Lynn Harris
>
^He was grinding before it was 'expected'
*
Self-published& sold books out the back of his car
*
Took them to barber shops/churches in his local area
>
He was in Atlanta – capital of the south and has a huge gay & black community, a community of very affluent professional black & gay men – the people he was writing about - so he was in the right place at the right time
*
Even for black readers who weren’t gay – this world he wrote about was upscaled, sophisticated populated with these characters who weren’t being written about at the time
*
He was speaking to a demographic of people who’d been severely neglected – affluent black Americans in the south, publishing hadn’t taken notice of them - he filled the gap and did very well
>
Amanda Hocking
*
She started writing fantasy fiction
>
One of the first to capitalise on ebooks in series & blogs
*
She recognised book bloggers had bigger audiences and lent out to them to gain connections that time
*
Price her ebooks cheaply (cause she had series) the book blogger really rallied behind her and made a lot money
*
She was one of the original self-published indie writers who succeeded
>
Christopher Paolini
>
Wrote Eargon when he was 15
*
Parents worked in publishing & supported him
>
Went on a book tour when he was 16 – got introduced to Harper Collins
*
Partially he was lucky – supportive parents, they underwrote him
*
But regardless it takes balls to do that
*
Willing to go at it at such a young age
>
Joanna Penn
*
Interesting case because she started in the traditional route – writing religious thrillers (American so God had to be in there somewhere…)
*
She didn’t get an agent, couldn’t get a traditional publisher – she self-published & learning from experiences she started writing about marketing books – how to self-publish & publish
*
Very consistent with branding, built herself a brand – she’s become a self-publishing expert & her fiction rides along with that
*
She said there was nothing that a traditional publishing house could offer her that she doesn’t already have – save the name of the publisher   
>
John Scalzi
*
Self-Published on his website (lo-fi self publishing) – developed a following through SUPER active on social media
*
Tried a ‘pay what you can’ process again all through his own website
*
Worked up enough of a following & audience to be offered a 3.4 million book deal
>
So, what do they all have in common?
*
The through-line is self-publishing
>
Self-publishing worked for them, but they also all worked their asses off for this, they were in the right place at the right time and had no small amount of luck
*
Publishing houses saw this and have all gone ‘oh this works, all authors should do this’
*
They're so desperate for a formula to successful book marketing but this is unformulaic-able like I mentioned before
>
Sooooooo - what's still viable?
*
Which of these from this 2013 website would still be viable, which ones would you consider doing, and which ones do you think might be problematic today?
>
Have a look through and make a mini-list for yourself
*
Things you think are still viable
*
Things that deffo aren't
*
Ones you're not sure on
>
In the end… here's the best marketing technique:
>
Word of mouth recommendation.
*
How often have you bought/watched/played/eaten/drank/whatever'd something before a friend/family member suggested it?
>
A recommendation from a friend will always be the most powerful marketing tool we've got.
*
All the other things are good but word of mouth is king